Boyana Anatolieva‡, Ivan Ivanov‡, Dimitar Gospodinov‡Corresponding author: Boyana Anatolieva ( b.todorova77@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Ivelina Yordanova © Boyana Anatolieva, Ivan Ivanov, Dimitar Gospodinov. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Citation:
Anatolieva B, Ivanov I, Gospodinov D (2025) A study on the expression of EZH2, Bcl-2 and Ber-EP in BCC. Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Research 555: 317-330. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbcr.e174917 |  |
Basal cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumour in humans. In cases with indistinct morphology on H&E-stained slides, immunohistochemistry may help distinguish basal cell carcinoma from other similar-appearing lesions. Our study aimed to investigate the expression of a marker panel comprising EZH2, Bcl-2, and Ber-EP4 in morphologically diagnosed, CK20-verified cutaneous basal cell carcinomas.
Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study of 50 histologically confirmed cases of basal cell carcinoma was conducted. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the following markers: EZH2, Bcl-2, Ber-EP4, and CK20. Due to the lack of a standardised method for evaluating markers, we adopted and modified the staining index (SI), which semi-quantitatively combines staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells. The results were systematised and interpreted using IBM SPSS.
Results: All 50 examined tumours tested negative for CK20 (100%), thereby excluding mimics. All 50 tumours stained positive for EZH2 and Bcl-2 (100%), and only one stained negative for Ber-EP4 (98% positive). We found no association between histological type and EZH2 (p = 0.376), Bcl-2 (p = 0.376), and Ber-EP4 (p = 0.318), respectively, or their co-expression (p = 0.258). High co-expression of two of the three markers was observed in 33 of the 50 examined cases (66%), and a low co-expression in 4 cases (8%).
Conclusion: The marker panel demonstrates co-expression of the three markers in the context of negative CK20 in over 90% of the cases. In challenging cases, it is important to consider clinical, morphological, and immunohistochemical features together.